I saw the Billy Crystal
special on cable TV about 700 Sundays where he talks about his youth and how he
wanted to be a NY Yankee or a comedian, or a very funny baseball player. I
thought about my early ambitions and realized that we come to ourselves through
a long series of ‘Nope, not that,’ or even ‘Been there, done that.’
I only wanted to be a writer
-- a Great American Novelist. More specifically, I wanted to be F. Scott
Fitzgerald. I didn’t want to be Zelda, the wife of a famous writer. The
lifestyle was not my focus, but the stories.
I liked how Fitzgerald used
anglo words and sneered at the French language that his buddy Hemingway only
side-stepped. I liked that
Fitzgerald exposed the pretension of the new money classes and didn’t require a
happy ending for a love story.
Later I discovered Lillian
Hellman and wanted to be her, except she was so uncomfortable in her skin (when
young). She told the stories from the point of view of the women, even though
they were victims of the plot rather than driving the plot. Margaret Atwood
does something similar, displaying the women as powerless in a stilted marriage
or without funds or smarts to make a difference.
But why not a story where
the female lead character drives the action?
You will suggest Sylvia
Plath, I’m certain. Nope, not that.
There’s Carson McCullers, of
course. Southern Gothic was her genre, and I was influenced by The Heart is a
Lonely Hunter that I read at an early age. McCullers was sorta chewed up by the
NYC writer’s lifestyle, though, as was Harper Lee (To Kill a Mockingbird).
These stories are presented
as confessions, a slice of life, illustrations of the era. Plots were
outgrowths of situation following that axiom to write what you know.
“Today you are You, that is
truer than true.
There is no one alive who is
Youer than You.”
– Dr. Seuess
But my life was boring –
well-raised, bookish, affluent, Midwestern (not from the South where they seem
to suffer more deeply). So … Nope, not that.
I liked action adventure
stories like The Perils of Pauline or Love is a Many-Splendored Thing. I wanted
the woman to drive a real plot. Why was that so much to ask?
So I read more stories by
women in the fantasy genre like Louise Erdrich who brings in mythical elements
from Native Americans, and Juliet Marillier’s series about a Daughter of the
Forest. The girl protagonist was typically young and imbued with unusual powers
of seeing. Other genre writers sent 14-year-old girls into battle in full armor
and wielding a 24-inch battle sword. This impossible heroine makes the same
choices a guy would make, except she’s gender female (often a cross-dresser
like Arya in Game of Thrones). Nope, not that.
I read Robin Hobb’s many
series (series-es) that start with The Assassin’s Apprentice. Hobb certainly
has the chops for the fantasy genre with immediacy and surprise. (Dragon
warming stations: still too funny!) I wondered why the primary character was
not a girl. The female characters (in the early series) were relegated to
stilted roles of a candle-maker and a misunderstood queen who wielded minimal
powers through example and patience. The many lady-aunties accomplished small
victories behind the scenes while presenting a benign presence at court. Nope,
not that.
Is the same true for you,
dear writer who is reading this blog? Do you come to goals for what you want to
accomplish by what you know you don’t want to reinforce? Here are some of my
standards I impose for my own stories:
·
Girl protagonist
(past age 18) who drives the story
·
The protagonist
isn’t isolated – knows her mother and sisters and cousins and opponents
·
Real problems
that real women have to solve (without pretending to be a boy)
·
Believable
obstacles such as no voice in public and no funds to achieve goals
·
A plot that has
a crescendo at the end, not slice of life
·
Each character
grows during the story arch (even the men)
This last goal is a pet peeve
of mine that I call the Lee Remick syndrome. She played opposite Jack Lemmon in
The Days of Wine and Roses. They were both drunks and he went through all the
stages including getting clean but backsliding. She kicked him out so she could
raise their daughter in a stable life, but he visited during his many
ups-and-downs. Each time she opened the door, Remick looked the same, not a
line on her face. She may have worn the same wig for the whole movie that
spanned a couple of decades. Nope, not that.
No comments:
Post a Comment